Problems connecting to vpn after upgrading to ubuntu 24.04
good afternoon, I have upgraded ubuntu to 24.04 and since then I can no longer connect correctly to the vpn with the f5 client. In the client it appears that I am connected to the vpn, but then I do not reach any of the sites and servers that with the 22.04 version if it arrived. Can you help me.
Need help on i-rule to specific uri path
Hello All, I'm working on an i-rule that I need to do the following; given a set of specific source ip addresses, only allow access to specific uris of /ws/rest/external*. I set the specific source addresses in a data group, referencing the data group. When I apply this i-rule to the virtual server, on testing I get an Insecure HTTPS message. I am on version 15.8.1.2. We plan to upgrade to most stable release on 16 soon. Any suggestions on what I can do with the i-rule posted below? Thanks in advance. when CLIENT_ACCEPTED { if { [class match [IP::client_addr] equals Boomi_external] } { pool esd-bmapi-dc1-as01-f5.lanl.gov_8077_pool } } when HTTP_REQUEST { if ![HTTP::has_responded] { if { ([HTTP::host] equals "apigway-d.lanl.gov" or [HTTP::host] equals "apigway-d.lanl.gov") } { if { [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/ws/rest/external* " || [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/ws/rest/external*" } { pool esd-bmapi-dc1-as01-f5.lanl.gov_8077_pool } else { reject } return } } }Pool Members communication with B-party via F5 VIP
Dear All, In general, the B-Party servers requesting data and F5 sending these requests to VIP pool members. But in my case, we want VIP pool members to be able to send requests to B-party servers via VIP. In this case all communications between VIP Pool members and B-party must be via VIP. How to configure that the Pool members can send requests via VIP to B-Party nodes and B-Party response to VIP. I will really appreciate your support and help in regard. Thanks, Rahmanullah
F5 not sending traffic to Web pool
Hello All, I am having issues with a new configured F5 big-IP that everything works fine as follows. traffic from the client is coming to the firewall which is then natted to the private network. (works) the Load balancer ( Virtual server) IP is accessible and request is sent to the virtual server. and from the big ip to the pool is not sent. connection between the F5 to the pool is fine and vice versa and pool and nodes are available (green). connection between web-server and F5 is through Https (443). configuration F5 as follows: F5 Virtual IP : 192.168.1.41 self IP: int 1 : 10.10.10.14 self IP int 2 : 192.168.1.41 web server pool : 10.10.10.X range with class c subnet. SSL is configured between the client to F5 as clientssl and between the server and F5 as serverssl. source address translation is automap. I am having trouble why it doesn't work and is trying to find out the problem.
I want to restore disabled&down interface due to LLCF.
Interface 1.1, 1.2 was up to vlan group. I set llcf to each other on these interfaces, and when 1.1 was subtracted, the state of 1.2 was disabled. Even if I try 1.1 again, 1.1 is disabled and 1.2 is down. I want to restore it to up, up. Please tell me howUsing okta as SSO to login F5 GUI
Hi All, Greetings..!! Currently we are using local user accounts in f5 to login. We have different users with different roles on f5. In our organization we are using okta for other apps authentication. Is it possible to have Okta for logging in f5 with SSO. If yes, please share the article or guide with the required configurations. Thanks in Advance, K Kuzhali
Content type hearder charset=UTF-8
Hello friends, We have a requirement to have WAF should only allow charset=UTF-8 in the Content-Type header. So curios does this cover by any rule in ASM policy or do we have to create a custom rule through iRule or other ? Basically our objective to accept only ute-8 and reject rest of any. Appreciate any inputs !!
