|
| DevCentral > Weblogs > - Two Different Socks
|
optimization
There are 44 entries for the tag optimization
 |
There’s compression, and then there’s compression. One of the most common means of improving application performance is to reduce the size of the data being exchanged as redress for inherent network protocol behavior that can cause excessive delays in delivery of application data. Compression is often enabled to achieve this goal, and because most data being delivered to applications is text-based (XML, HTML, JSON) this technique generally works quite well. Depending on the architecture of the application delivery network, however, there may be other “types” of compression that can be used in addition to the “compression” typically associated...
posted @ Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:48 AM |
|
|
Scaling applications that include AJAX and non-AJAX components may require more than just tuning your web server A common problem after deploying a Web 2.0 AJAX-based application shows itself through poor performance or lower capacity on the server, often both. Web serving tuning is almost always the first step in improving performance and capacity, but the inherently competing behavior of AJAX-requests and “normal” HTTP requests quickly becomes problematic as well. Tune for the AJAX requests and performance of regular old HTTP requests suffers. Tune for regular old HTTP requests, and performance of AJAX-requests suffer. This is...
posted @ Monday, February 08, 2010 4:35 AM |
|
|
We worry about VM sprawl but what about device sprawl? Management of a multitude of network-deployed solutions can be as operationally inefficient as managing hundreds of virtual machines, and far more detrimental to the health and performance of your applications. Turning them all into virtual network appliances that might need scaling themselves? That’s even badder. But all you hardware fanbois best not smirk too much because the proliferation of hardware network devices is only slightly less badder than the potential problems arising from virtual network appliance sprawl. WAIT, WHY IS DEVICE SPRAWL BAD AGAIN?...
posted @ Friday, February 05, 2010 4:02 AM |
|
|
Nope. Wasn’t under the couch. In fact it turns out it wasn’t even missing, it’s just been overlooked and might already be in your data center. As more organizations continue to make virtualization a core part of their overall application deployment strategy they are finding challenges associated with managing and, apparently, optimizing their newly created heterogeneous infrastructure. Kevin Fogarty, in “10 Virtualization Vendors to Watch in 2010”, writes of some of the challenges with virtualization to come in the next year. One of those challenges is, apparently, optimization of resources across physical and virtual assets, at least...
posted @ Tuesday, January 26, 2010 4:02 AM |
|
|
Infrastructure 2.0 enabled application delivery platforms have more than a few things in common with the Transformers. Like Autobots, there’s more to it than meets the eye. If you’re familiar with the mythology of the Transformers – and perhaps even if you aren’t – you know that they key attribute of Transformers is their ability to take on “alternate modes” such as cars, trucks, and winged vehicles simply by scanning the object and then adapting their own form to match. One of the key premises of Infrastructure 2.0 is also the ability of network and...
posted @ Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:02 AM |
|
|
We’ve been talking about “aligning IT with the business” since SOA first took legs but you rarely see CONCRETE EXMAPLES OF WHAT THAT REALLY MEANS. It sounds much more grand and lofty than it really is. To put it in layman’s terms, or at least take it out of marketing terms, aligning IT with the business is really nothing more than justifying or tying a particular IT investment or project to a specific business goal. What that means ultimately is that you, as an IT professional, must understand what those business goals are in the first place. Once...
posted @ Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:11 AM |
|
|
Like peanut-butter and jelly, cloud computing and application acceleration are just better together. Ann Bednarz of Network World waxes predictive regarding 2010 trends in application delivery and WAN optimization in WAN optimization in 2010. One of the interesting tidbits she offers from research firm Gartner is growth in the application acceleration market: Second, the research firm is predicting a return to modest growth for the application acceleration market in 2010. Gartner is forecasting a compound annual growth rate of 12.22%, with 2014 revenue of $4.27 billion. This, when viewed alongside...
posted @ Thursday, December 17, 2009 3:21 AM |
|
|
Certainly no one would seriously argue that web applications are fast enough for everyone. SPDY is one suggested solution, but what if we combine MapReduce and SPDY? Could we develop an architectural solution that leverages the best of SPDY without requiring entire infrastructure changes to support a new protocol? More than a couple of people have mentioned Map/Reduce as a means to achieve workload-level distribution of applications in a cloud computing environment. I hadn’t looked into Map/Reduce but finally decided that if that many very smart people were thinking it was a solution, I should look into it....
posted @ Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:14 AM |
|
|
IMAGE CREDIT: DANIEL PENNEY Everyone has surely experienced the frustration of an overloaded desktop/laptop. You’ve just got too many apps open at one time and the performance of your machine has been slowly degrading to the point where you can select an application from the toolbar, run down to the local Starbucks, stop and chat with a friend, and return to find the application still not ready for use. The same thing happens on servers. Even though a web/application server is likely only running a few critical applications,...
posted @ Thursday, October 22, 2009 4:13 AM |
|
|
Back in the day when I was actually allowed to write code for customers the pat answer to any code being returned from QA because of problems was a flat “but it works on my machine.” Alright, alright, I’ll be honest; it wasn’t flat at all, it usually a plaintive whine. This isn’t an uncommon scenario as differences in environments and interactions with other applications may be enough to cause problems on one machine and not another. Troubleshooting such subtle issues were painful, to say the least, and not something anyone wanted to do. Now comes the time...
posted @ Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:37 AM |
|
|
Commoditized from solution to feature, from feature to function, load balancing is no longer a solution but rather a function of more advanced solutions that’s still an integral component for highly-available, fault-tolerant applications. Unashamed Parody of Monty Python and the Holy Grail Load balancers: I'm not dead. The Market: 'Ere, it says it’s not dead. Analysts: Yes it is. Load balancers: I'm not. The Market: It isn't. Analysts: Well, it will be soon,...
posted @ Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:00 AM |
|
|
Sharing is core to a successful cloud implementation but not something every organization does well. How do you encourage business stakeholders to play well with others? In most definitions of “cloud computing” there lies a central, key component: shared resources. It is the sharing of resources, in fact, through which many of the benefits of reduced operating expenses are supposed to be achieved. It is the sharing of resources – or perceived inability to share resources – that confounds some folks when discussing private cloud, although there are several ways in which sharing of resources can...
posted @ Friday, September 11, 2009 4:01 AM |
|
|
Why do application delivery vendors talk about both? Aren’t they the same thing? In general, acceleration implies that something will be done to the application: caching, compression, etc… The actual behavior of the application is changed such that the client may need to participate in the acceleration. Acceleration is technically speaking disruptive in the sense that it requires participation of client, intermediary, and often the server. This generally takes a form that leverages existing standards, a la caching, such that no changes need be made to clients or servers, but the behavior of the application and its...
posted @ Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:00 AM |
|
|
The importance of a full-proxy architecture to application delivery, security, cloud computing, and virtualization People often describe the act of changing focus from one related but distinct task to another as “wearing two different hats.” Like moving from “developer” to “administrator” when you’re trying to deploy an application in a testing environment. You’re the developer, but then you have to “switch gears” and become a server administrator in order to ensure that the application server and its environment is configured properly before you can actually test the application you just wrote. But the metaphor...
posted @ Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:07 AM |
|
|
Is ESB just an expensive integration hub or is there more to the story than we heard… In the beginning, the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus), was marketed as much more than an integration technology. While the core of an ESB is certainly about connectivity between services, there was – and still is – so much more to an ESB than just integrating disparate protocols and technologies. Transformation, parallel processing, content based routing, and service orchestration are among the more useful and beneficial capabilities of an ESB. That’s why it was somewhat surprising to see the CTO of...
posted @ Friday, July 17, 2009 3:26 AM |
|
|
One of the tasks of an enterprise architect is to design a framework atop which developers can implement and deploy applications consistently and easily. The consistency is important for internal business continuity and reuse; common objects, operations, and processes can be reused across applications to make development and integration with other applications and systems easier. Architects also often decide where functionality resides and design the base application infrastructure framework. Application server, identity management, messaging, and integration are all often a part of such architecture designs. Rarely does the architect concern him/herself with the network infrastructure, as that is...
posted @ Wednesday, June 17, 2009 4:07 AM |
|
|
Two steps forward, three steps back Every time there is a major shift in technology thought about architecture the question of how it will and should impact infrastructure arises. When SOA was the “next great thing” there was a spate of announcements regarding how infrastructure would not only support it but integrate into its ecosystem. This time it’s virtualization, and its impact on infrastructure both from a support standpoint and usage is getting a lot of mindshare. In a recent announcement around virtual network infrastructure Om Malik of GigaOm has some interesting commentary: As...
posted @ Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:27 AM |
|
|
If you’ve ever played Dungeons & Dragons for an extended period of time (a campaign, in the vernacular) you know that of all the classes available the cleric is the least likely to be chosen willingly. The cleric class is much like the kid picked last in kickball, chosen only because you have to, not because you want to. Okay, bard may actually be less likely but cleric is really, really close and you need a cleric, you don’t necessarily need a bard. The problem is that clerics can be somewhat dull to play but...
posted @ Tuesday, May 05, 2009 3:38 AM |
|
|
You can’t afford not to invest in technologies that leverage virtualization to improve data center efficiency There’s an old adage that says you have to spend money to make money. In the data center these days this is more true than ever. You have to invest in technology capable of making your data center more efficient in order to make (save) money. A recent Robert Half Technology survey of 1400 CIOs indicates that data center efficiency and virtualization are top priorities. *CIOs were asked, "Which areas, if any, will your IT department be investing...
posted @ Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:00 AM |
|
|
What is this application delivery thing that everyone keeps telling me I need? Isn’t that just the latest marketing term for load balancing? A recently released Forrester report concludes that “firms must develop and integrated strategy for application delivery.” We don’t disagree with that, or with the Gartner report claiming that “Load Balancing is Dead, Time to Focus on Application Delivery.” Application delivery is the next step in the logical evolutionary path from the tactical solution of load balancing to a comprehensive application infrastructure strategy. Forrester’s research indicates that despite the fact that application...
posted @ Monday, April 20, 2009 3:40 AM |
|
|
This whole Web 2.0-sucking-the-life-out-of-servers problem? Yeah, it’s nothing new if you’ve been paying attention. I am not one prone to fits of smug arrogance. I don’t generally ever say “I told you so” (even if I did) or tsk-tsk when you failed to listen to some nugget of wisdom and it bites you some place…unpleasant. Don often tells me I should, and he will if I won’t, but most of the time I simply bite my tongue and let it pass on by. It’s my job to offer up the information, not force it down your throat....
posted @ Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:46 AM |
|
|
The acceleration technique known as pre-fetching went the way of the do-do bird sometime around 2002. But perhaps it should be resurrected, just in a different place and with a slightly different focus. A SHORT HISTORY OF ACCELERATION TECHNIQUES Most modern acceleration techniques revolve around two things: decreasing the amount of data to be transferred (compression, optimization of the client-side cache) or twiddling with protocols (TCP, HTTP) and their associated behaviors to improve the overall speed at which a client and server communicate. Back in the early days of application acceleration most technologies were...
posted @ Tuesday, April 14, 2009 3:01 AM |
|
|
You’ve declared your Data Center Independence. You’ve agreed on a basic set of rights. The problem now is ensuring that those rights are upheld and that you can achieve that independence. We’re not innocent bystanders in the data center revolution; we wholly support your rights to choose the architecture and solutions that best fit your environment. You can’t do it alone. You need tools with which to fight the data center revolution. So we’re arming you with at least some of those tools (hey, we can’t do it all alone) with the introduction of BIG-IP v10...
posted @ Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:47 AM |
|
|
Better performance, reduced costs and data center footprint are not niche-market interests. The fast-paced world of finance is taking a hard look at the benefits of hardware acceleration for performance and finding additional benefits such as a reduction in rack-space via consolidation of server hardware. Rich Miller over at Data Center Knowledge writes: Hardware acceleration addresses computationally-intensive software processes that task the CPU, incorporating special-purpose hardware such as a graphics processing unit (GPUs) or field programmable gate array (FPGA) to shift parallel software functions to the hardware level. ...
posted @ Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:27 AM |
|
|
Ah, those were the days, weren’t they? When improving the security, reliability, and performance of applications over the LAN, over the WAN, and over the Internet meant you had to deploy many different solutions, each one standing on their own in the data center. When you had to learn how to configure and manage as many devices as you have fingers just to deliver a single business-critical application to users and customers across a wide variety of environments. When there really wasn’t an option because solutions weren’t unified, weren’t contextually aware, and were basically just a bunch of point solutions...
posted @ Monday, March 23, 2009 3:21 AM |
|
|
Ah, those were the days, weren’t they? When you needed a way to add security at several layers to your network and application network infrastructure but knew that implementing a solution capable of securing those pesky applications was more than likely going to end up with poor performance and angry users. When you needed to add something to secure applications and the network against the growing wave of attacks but knew that doing so would negatively impact performance. It was a tough choice, and most people ended up going the route of maintaining application performance at the expense...
posted @ Monday, March 16, 2009 3:39 AM |
|
|
Ah, those were the days, weren’t they? When you needed a way to inspect data at the edge for application-specific issues but knew that implementing a solution capable of that kind of agility was more than likely going to end up with poor performance and angry users. When you needed to add something to secure applications and the network against the growing wave of attacks but knew that doing so would negatively impact performance. It was a tough choice, and most people ended up going the route of maintaining application performance at the expense of security and optimization...
posted @ Monday, March 09, 2009 4:30 AM |
|
|
Increasingly WAN optimization solutions are adopting the application acceleration moniker, implying a focus that just does not exist. WAN optimization solutions are designed to improve the performance of the network, not applications, and while the former does beget improvements of the latter, true application acceleration solutions offer greater opportunity for improving efficiency and end-user experience as well as aiding in consolidation efforts that result in a reduction in operating and capital expenditure costs. WAN Optimization solutions are, as their title implies, focused on the WAN; on the network. It is their task to improve the utilization of bandwidth,...
posted @ Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:29 AM |
|
|
Owning the stack is important to security, but it’s also integral to a lot of other application delivery functions. And in some cases, it’s downright necessary. Hoff rants with his usual finesse in a recent posting with which I could not agree more. Not only does he point out the wrongness of equating SaaS with “The Cloud”, but points out the importance of “owning the stack” to security. Those that have control/ownership over the entire stack naturally have the opportunity for much tighter control over the "security" of their offerings. Why? because they...
posted @ Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:13 AM |
|
|
It has been suggested that the use of application acceleration solutions as a means to improve application performance would result in programmers writing less efficient code. In a comment on “The House that Load Balancing Built” a reader replies: Not only will it cause the application to grow in cost and complexity, it's teaching new and old programmers to not write efficient code and rely on other products and services on [sic] thier behalf. I.E. Why write security into the app, when the ADC can do that for me. Why write code that...
posted @ Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:41 AM |
|
|
The year 2009 may be remembered as the year technologies died. First Anne Thomas Maynes of Burton Group declared SOA dead, and more recently Mark Fabbi of Gartner announced the death of load balancers. The difference in the obituaries is striking: Maynes declare an entire architectural model dead while Fabbi merely declares the death of a product, not the technological concepts behind it. Load balancers may be dead, the concept of load balancing lives on as a critical foundation for more advanced and valuable features available in the load balancer’s evolutionary replacement: the application delivery controller. Where Maynes gives...
posted @ Monday, February 16, 2009 5:10 AM |
|
|
Open APIs are a matter of much discussion these days in the realm of cloud computing. Just take a peek at the discussion that occurred via Twitter during Cloud Connect. Many folks were not shy in putting forth the notion that cloud portability and interoperability can only be achieved through accepted "cloud" standards. Integration standards, for the cloud, if you will. The fear is that any emerging standards will focus only the portability of the application or virtual container environment. They are likely to ignore the fact that no application is an island, and that the application delivery...
posted @ Monday, January 26, 2009 3:40 AM |
|
|
The debate this week is on location, specifically we're back arguing over whether there exist such things as "private" clouds. Data Center Knowledge has a good recap of some of the opinions out there on the subject, and of course I have my own opinion. Location is, in fact, important to cloud computing, but probably not in the way most people are thinking right now. While everyone is concentrating on defining cloud computing based on whether it's local or remote, folks have lost sight that location is important for other reasons. It is the location...
posted @ Wednesday, January 21, 2009 7:13 AM |
|
|
As an application delivery solution provider focused on securing, accelerating, and optimizing web applications, we pay a lot of attention to web application development trends. Languages, environments, and technologies are all of significant interest because in many cases the decisions regarding development affect the security and performance of applications deployed in production. AJAX-based applications, for example, can have a significant impact on performance of the application and on the network (and vice-versa), so we pay attention to its adoption and use and are always looking for new ways to secure and accelerate applications using the technology. ...
posted @ Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:35 AM |
|
|
Christofer Hoff, better known as @Beaker to the Twitterverse, put on his devil's advocacy hat (yes, it really is a good color for him) yesterday and questioned whether there was a need for hardware application delivery solutions in the cloud. He postulated via Twitter that application delivery functions would become part of the cloud fabric and thus whether they were implemented in hardware or software was largely irrelevant. Generally speaking we're in agreement on that one. But then he really used that devil's advocacy hat and suggested that the application delivery control layer might be virtualized and...
posted @ Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:15 AM |
|
|
Horizontal scalability achieved through the implementation of a load balancing solution is easy. It's vertical scalability that's always been and remains difficult to achieve, and it's even more important in a cloud computing or virtualized environment because now it can hurt you where it counts: the bottom line. Horizontal scalability is the ability of an application to be scaled up to meet demand through replication and the distribution of requests across a pool or farm of servers. It's the traditional load balanced model, and it's an integral component of cloud computing environments. Vertical scalability is the ability of...
posted @ Tuesday, November 25, 2008 3:29 AM |
|
|
Sometimes IT folks are tasked with coming up with the justification for purchasing technology. It's not an enjoyable task, and considering the incredible difficulty in trying to pin dollar values on soft factors like increased productivity and an improved user experience the chore can be quite painful. Technology that's become commoditized generally doesn't require ROI justification; when is the last time you were asked what the return...
posted @ Monday, September 22, 2008 4:44 AM |
|
|
No, it's not this one. It's not even mine. It's this one on High Scalability written by Todd Hoff. Not only does he explain latency and its sources, but its costs. Then he goes on to offer a plethora of ways to reduce latency. A couple of suggestions he offers are: Use a TCP Offload Engine (TOE). TOE tech offloads the TCP/IP stack from the main CPU and puts it on the network controller. This means network adapters can respond faster which means faster end-to-end communication. Network adapters respond faster because bus...
posted @ Monday, August 25, 2008 8:49 AM |
|
|
One of the "real world" lessons rarely taught in the university setting is that in the "real world" you're going to have to follow coding standards. Back in the day, when I was allowed to code, I often railed against some of those coding standards on the basis that they impaired application performance. Anyone with a firm grounding in computer science knows that the introduction of a local scope necessarily means more work (and thus memory and cycles consumed) to set up the stack: copying variables, pushing parameters, etc... That means that a conditional statement with just one...
posted @ Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:29 AM |
|
|
An application delivery controller (ADC) essentially acts a reverse proxy. That means that client requests interact with the ADC, and the ADC interacts with web and application servers on the client's behalf. This mediation offers the chance to implement acceleration, availability, and security features without requiring changes to existing applications. There are many, many more features in an ADC that provide significant value. These eight capabilities are the most commonly employed features in reverse-proxy application delivery solutions that provide immediate benefits to web applications, and all can be used without modifying applications or the servers on...
posted @ Friday, August 01, 2008 4:56 AM |
|
|
I read a very nice blog post yesterday discussing some of the traditional pros and cons of load-balancing configurations. The author comes to the conclusion that if you can use direct server return, you should. I agree with the author's list of pros and cons; DSR is the least intrusive method of deploying a load-balancer in terms of network configuration. But there are quite a few disadvantages missing from the author's list. Author's List of Disadvantages of DSR The disadvantages of Direct Routing are: Backend server...
posted @ Thursday, July 03, 2008 4:29 AM |
|
|
Application delivery controllers, and load balancing in general, are often seen as solutions waiting for a problem to solve. We know what those problems are, but until we experience them we often don't feel a sense of urgency in acquiring and deploying an application delivery controller. While it's certainly true that an application delivery controller can solve many problems that arise, it's also true that there are benefits to acquiring and deploying an application delivery controller before it becomes absolutely necessary in order to save your application, your site, or your job. So here are six...
posted @ Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:59 AM |
|
|
I was out trying to trim the hedges the other day, and doing...poorly. I tried, I really did, to make them as neat as the guys I hired last year, but alas, I just couldn't. Oh, it's "good enough", that's for sure, but it isn't as good as it could be. And when I went to clean up the landscaping - picking up small pieces of hedges and leaves - I couldn't help but think that those guys had some kind of secrets to doing this much more efficiently than I. Which got me thinking about application networking....
posted @ Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:35 AM |
|
|
This is an interesting, albeit very short, post on web acceleration options. The author, Todd, gives a pretty quick "hit list" of reasons to use hardware (such as an application delivery controller) over the built-in capabilities of your web server: 1. Compression 2. Caching 3. TCP enhancements (optimizations) There are additional benefits to using a hardware solution with specific features/functionality that address web acceleration that Todd doesn't mention, perhaps because these options are not necessarily available for web servers and operating systems. 1. Better browser control. Many web application acceleration products are capable of manipulating the...
posted @ Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
