Topics


Blogs


Forums


Samples


Media


Labs


Resources

 




DevCentral > Weblogs > Ryan Korock - Ryan's take
 Load Balancing Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007
posted on Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:00 PM

I’m not sure how many of you have considered Office Communications Server 2007 (OCS) yet, however the new functionality such as VOIP, Web Conferencing, and Application Sharing are starting to attract some real visibility within the Unified Communications space. In fact, Gartner places Microsoft squarely in the leader’s quadrant for their UC 2007 Magic Quadrant.

 

http://mediaproducts.gartner.com/reprints/nortel/150273.html

 

Providing high availability and scalability for an OCS deployment is becoming more and more critical to the enterprises are looking to adopt OCS as part of their communications strategy. Interestingly enough, Microsoft has gone as far as requiring the use of a “hardware load balancer” for enterprise deployments. NLB is not supported in lab or production deployments with OCS.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/939800

 

We’ve been working and testing with the OCS product team since the early alpha release days to make sure that we could provide a compatible solution for load balancing OCS. The good news is that we have a rock solid solution, tested by both F5 and Microsoft, and documented here

 

http://www.f5.com/pdf/deployment-guides/microsoft-ocs-ltm94-dg.pdf

 

We put over 6 months of testing, documenting, and collaboration with Microsoft in putting this deployment guide together. If you’re looking for architectural strategies, best practices, or even just configuration instructions, take a look, they’re in there.

 

I’d also like to elicit any feedback on deploying BIG-IP & OCS. My team tends to receive quite a bit of field related experiences on the subject, and our plan is to include this type of feedback in the form of best practice updates to these guides.



 
      

Feedback


3/14/2008 2:55 AM
Gravatar Are theye any alternatives to F5, cheaper ones. the F5s are very expensives VS a Enterprise deployment of OCS, i find alot of resistance from end users to even look at them due to costs. Very good unit for the Larger 5000 plus clients but for thoses sub 5k that want reslilience a bit too heavy

thanks
Rob

6/15/2008 9:42 PM
Gravatar I have heard about Nortel Load Balancers. They also have been tested approved for Microsoft OCS and are quite cheaper than F5...
Prashant

8/7/2009 10:49 AM
Gravatar A10 Networks has twice the performance of F5 and at 1/2 the Price with all feayures turned on day one

Nortel EOL their SLB
Dale

8/14/2009 7:41 AM
Gravatar
I like to cut the corn kernels off of my corn on the cob. I then throw out the kernels and gnaw on the cob. Sometimes I cut the cob up into little pieces with a modified hacksaw as my knife. It's kind of tough and chewy so you must have a jaw of iron to eat it like I do. Mother shuckers!
Corn Cob Billy

10/6/2009 4:33 AM
Gravatar Hi,

The problem with the A10 products are that they are just another legacy hardware appliance.

For real ROI, plus more functionality, you need to look at the Zeus software products.

http://www.zeus.com
Nick Bond
 Leave Feedback
Title  
Name  
Email
Url
Comments   
Please add 4 and 5 and type the answer here: