CPPProgrammingLanguageBookCover I was trolling through my feeds this morning and saw the post "Developers Will Find C++ Applications Playing Surprisingly Strategic Role in 2008 with Multi-Core and SOA"

Oh Realy?

Not if Microsoft, Sun, IBM, BEA, Apache, or any other mainstream development platform vendor/org has anything to say about it.

We'll start with this:

While developers often think of developing new applications on Microsoft's .NET or a variety of Java platforms, C++ remains one of the most widely deployed development languages for mission critical applications.

Define "Mission Critical" here.  If they mean, legacy systems then I wouldn't disagree.  In my experiences with our large enterprise customers and partners, I have heard ZERO talk about development in C++ in current projects.  Our customers are working on cutting edge automation and dynamic service environments and if C++ was the "most widely deployed development language", you would think it would come up at least once.  The mix I see is roughly 60% Java, 30% .Net, and 10% other (php, ruby, python).  Maybe C++ falls into that other 10% category, but even if it is, that's hardly the "most widely deployed".

The reason for this is simple; C++ continues to be better for many use cases, and software developers want to be able to use the 'right tool for the job.'

Totally agree.  That's why I see .Net/Java accounting for 90% of all new development projects I see in the enterprise space.

In addition, C++ projects are the second most active projects on both Apache and SourceForge.

Hmmmm.  Taking a look at Apache's list of projects organized by language, C++ shows only ONE project.  That must be one heck of an active product to the 80+ java based projects listed there.  I wonder where they got their data from on that one?

Well, look on the bright side, if you are an organization looking at either enhancing an existing system (or building a new one) in C++, you'll only have a 3-12% premium on your developer costs:

C++ developers, themselves, can look at 2008 as a breakout year for their own careers as well. According to PayScale, a global online compensation research provider, the median salary for C++ developers is three to twelve percent higher than those of Java or .NET developers.

It took me a second reading of this article to realize the motivation behind it.  It's a press release for Rogue Wave.  No, not the the band that is #1 and #2 on Google Search.  It's the Rogue Wave that is "the leading provider of enterprise class C++ components and infrastructure".  Now it makes some sense...

It's worth pointing out that Microsoft's Parallel Computing Developer Center and IBM's Distributed Parallel Programming Environment for Java are there to help out with those stuck in the world of .Net and Java and want to catch a ride on the multi-core SOA train.

What do you all think?  Will 2008 really be the year for C++?  I'm having a hard time seeing it.  Who knows, maybe I should switch my focus and get that 12% pay increase B-).