Forum Discussion

Randy_Johnson_1's avatar
Randy_Johnson_1
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Sep 29, 2011

Monitor settings - Interval, Timeout, etc.

Can someone provide an easy to understand description of the Monitor settings 'Interval' and 'timeout' ?

 

My understanding is that monitors default to a 5 second interval, with a 16 second timeout.

 

 

Does this mean the monitor daemon runs an instance of the monitor every 5 seconds against every pool member, and every running instance of the monitor has a 16 second time out value ?

 

 

Is there a way to configure a monitor such that it requires several failures before acting on a pool member ?

 

 

Thanks !!

 

management
monitoring

3 Replies

Sort By
  • Mike_Kahler_488's avatar
    Mike_Kahler_488
    Historic F5 Account
    Sep 29, 2011
    Hi Randy, I wondered that a while back and did some testing using nc and telnet while running tcpdump. My tests were run on early 10.x BIG-IP LTM using an HTTP monitor. Note sure which exact version. From my notes:

     

     

    The interval takes effect whenever an HTTP health monitor connects to the pool member. This behavior is different if the health monitor passes or fails. For a passing monitor, the succesful GET will close the connection and mark the pool member up. The LTM will then use the interval timer to establish a new connection. For the default interval/timeout 5/16, the health monitor may invoke a new connection and GET around every 5 seconds.

     

     

    For a failed monitor, the LTM will establish a connection to the pool member and send up to 4 GET's, per the interval set, before closing the connection. If, after 4 GET's, the timeout has not been met, the LTM will establish a new connection and will continue this behavior until the timeout has been exceeded. At that time the LTM will mark a pool member down.

     

     

    • sprashanthac_81's avatar
      sprashanthac_81
      Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
      Aug 09, 2016

      So pretty much we cannot have an interval lesser than the original interval value. So looks like the rule is must as below always

       

      Interval =< Timeout

       

      Reason for the ask, the client is requesting for a interval of 5 but wants the switch over immediately when the application is down. Any response is appreciated what they are looking for is

       

      Interval =< Timeout BUT when failure in response immediately switch over to another server

       

      to have Interval >= Timeout which I am thinking is not logical but please suggest thank you

       

  • hooleylist's avatar
    hooleylist
    Icon for Cirrostratus rankCirrostratus
    Sep 30, 2011
    This post has additional detail as well:

     

     

    http://devcentral.f5.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&view=topic&postid=19455&ptarget=19509

     

     

    interval: how often in seconds to send a request

     

     

    timeout: how long to wait for a successful response before marking the member down

     

     

    By default, these values are set to interval and timeout of 5 sec and 16 seconds (timeout = 3 x interval + 1). So the monitoring daemon starts a timer equal to the value of the timeout. It will send a request every five seconds--the length of the interval. When it receives a successful response, the countdown is reset to the timeout value. In this scenario, the node basically has three chances to respond before being marked down. Requests are still sent every interval even when the node is marked down. This allows for automatic resumption of use of the node when it responds correctly to a request. If you want to keep the node marked down even after it responds again, you can enable 'manual resume'.

     

     

    If you want to give the node more chances to respond before marking it down, you could extend the timeout length. Setting the interval and timeout to 5 and 31 would mean the node would get sent six requests before being marked down.

     

     

    Aaron