marsmann_58298
Sep 30, 2008Nimbostratus
Advantages and Disadvantages to trunk LTMs
Hi all,
First time poster. Relatively new to F5's. Did some searching but found nothing conclusive so far.
What are the advantages and/or disadvantages with using trunks on two LTM 1500s to a Cisco switch for passing all vlans/tagging?
Our environment is pretty straightforward and we run an internal/external config. Currently we run dedicated vlans on each interface for eg:
vlan 128 on int 1.1
vlan 129 on int 1.2
vlan 130 on int 1.3
the previous network admin was against trunking and the new guy is strongly for it and I don't see any strong argument either way other than not needing to pass all of the layer 2 traffic that you get in a trunk to the F5's.
What benefits do I gain by trunking all interfaces to pass along tagged traffic? Or, what am I losing/what disadvantages will I see doing this? Even from a Security perspective I would just put an intermediary switch in between the segments.
Our setup is
client
|
cisco 4503
|
F5 VIP
|
same cisco 4503
|
Web Servers
the design I am working on to re-architect our environment consists of multi-homing the web servers with a dedicated subnet (non routable, no gateway) which would hang off of a dedicated vlan behind the F5's only. That way a request would come in, hit the F5 and it would route right to the server and back without traversing the rest of the network. Only the flat L2 switch it would be connected to. Seems easier and more logical to me than all of the tagging through the rest of our core network using the L3 capable cores.
any insight appreciated. thanks.