Forum Discussion

epaalx's avatar
epaalx
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Sep 16, 2011

Wishing to use F5 LTM as HTTP NAT

I have a requirement to bypass normal security measures for servers seeking license and/or updates.

Below is the simplified version of network.

As per security requirements, Router R1 will only forward traffic to destinations matching predefined F5's Virtual Server address space - all other traffic will be dropped.

My idea is to ask Server owners to insert a cookie into HTTP Request specifying real destination IP but send traffic to VS on Border F5. Ideally, Border F5 VS's iRule would then retrieve that cookie, overwriting HTTP/1.1's HOST header and forward packets to that real destination.

My issue is - as far as I know, VS's iRule can only select from existing pools composed of static members which I can't possibly know before the HTTP Requests arrives - I can't create a pool dynamically (although, I am nor sure how
LB::select
actually works).

Any ideas?

4 Replies

  • Why dont you add the forwarding virtual server rather than a load balancing virtual server and match the irule. Forwarding virtual server will forward the packet based on the routing table and will send to the default gw.
  • Thanks... The issue is with the Router R1 - as I wrote, it will only forward traffic to destinations matching predefined (Border) F5's Virtual Server address space - all other traffic will be dropped.
  • My issue is - as far as I know, VS's iRule can only select from existing pools composed of static members which I can't possibly know before the HTTP Requests arrives - I can't create a pool dynamically (although, I am nor sure how LB::select actually works).

     

    u may use RESOLV::lookup to do name resolution on-the-fly and use node command to send traffic to the destination.

     

    RESOLV::lookup

     

    http://devcentral.f5.com/wiki/iRules.resolv__lookup.ashx

     

     

    cheer!
  • > use node command

     

    That's what I was looking for... Thanks!