Forum Discussion

Nimbostratus

Aug 25, 2023

Dynamic Bandwidth Control Policy for Exchange 2016 Clients using (Active Sync | IMAP | MAPI | OWA)

Hey folks, we used the Exchange 2016 iApp to deploy the On Premise Exchange 2016 Server in the F5. The F5 only acts as a Loadbalaner for the On-Prem Exchanger Server. We are now facing a bandwidth ...

application delivery

event

whisperer

MVP

Sep 17, 2023

F5 or partner professional services can most certainly assist with writing iRules from scratch. Usually such bandwidth controls are performed via a NGFW implementation. However, the following is a good technical primer on how to accomplish this with the F5:

https://techdocs.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/tmos-implementations-11-5-1/7.html

Forum Discussion

Dynamic Bandwidth Control Policy for Exchange 2016 Clients using (Active Sync | IMAP | MAPI | OWA)

Recent Discussions

Pool Members communication with B-party via F5 VIP

GCP F5 deployment - Active -Active with config Sync

GSLB - Monitoring LTM VIP load balancing via iRule

HTTP Header Rewrite - X-Forwarded-Proto

Ansible F5 imperative collection works with proxies, declarative collection doesn't

Related Content

How much bandwidth are we using?

Improve BIG-IP APM VPN speed with TLS dynamic record size

How Much Bandwidth is Too Much?

APM VPN Bandwidth Controller iApp

F5 APM VPN Choking Internet Bandwidth