Forum Discussion
Hamish
Feb 17, 2012Cirrocumulus
Hmm...
9.4.3 makes it a bit more difficult. I did something for this in 2010 on LDAP servers. But the iRule was designed to be pretty lightweight and the actual calculations for average response times etc was offloaded to a separate server, because different users were expected to have different SLA requirements. (See the LDAP_Stats_Measuring iRule).
The measurements and tracking of response times was tracked by user (ldap bind id), but it required tables. Assuming you don't need that... Hmm.. Not sure. Would need a bit more thought. Any chance you could upgrade to v10.2?
Even then though, you have the problem of working out when the response times decrease again... v11 you could use a sideband connection...
More thought required...
H