Forum Discussion
Joe_Rindfleisch
Sep 01, 2011Nimbostratus
That looks like it would work for me.
but
All of my forwarding,SOCKS,FTP,SFTP connections will Be protocol 6 (TCP)
i will not need other class based on protocol .
Is there a way for me to manage all of these source\port connections by creating classes in some meaningful way?
maybe by:
costumer connections
or
by type of connection (FWD, SOCKS,SFT,FTP)
or the most granular
by port (listing all sources that can get to those ports)
would be best if i didn't have to modify the iRule just add classes with a name that will cause it to match within the rule.
I could just keep this:
6 {
TCP
set proto tcp
}
and put all in one tcp class (not sure how manageable or scalable will it be?