Forum Discussion

cjunior_138458's avatar
cjunior_138458
Icon for Altostratus rankAltostratus
May 06, 2016
Solved

sitcky persistence regardless of whether members offline

Hi, I wrote the iRule below and I'll appreciate if anyone can tell me if have another and/or better way to do that. I have an case which the communication needs to be persisted with source add...
application delivery
LTM
  • Hannes_Rapp_162's avatar
    Hannes_Rapp_162
    May 08, 2016

    It may not be appropriate for your use-case, but I have a semi-good solution. Just remove the health-check from your Pool configuration, so the status is always "unknown (blue)". For your monitoring purpose, create another Pool with the existing configuration, but do not apply it to any Virtual Servers. That way you will also know when and if your Pool Members became unavailable.

     

    Regards,

     

Hannes_Rapp_162's avatar
Hannes_Rapp_162
Icon for Nacreous rankNacreous
May 08, 2016

It may not be appropriate for your use-case, but I have a semi-good solution. Just remove the health-check from your Pool configuration, so the status is always "unknown (blue)". For your monitoring purpose, create another Pool with the existing configuration, but do not apply it to any Virtual Servers. That way you will also know when and if your Pool Members became unavailable.

 

Regards,

 

  • cjunior's avatar
    cjunior
    Icon for Nacreous rankNacreous
    May 09, 2016
    I thought about doing this way, but I gave up when the access could fail on the first try. On the other hand, you gave to me a good idea to take off this complex iRule. I'll change my approach, thank you again.