Forum Discussion

refra_151287's avatar
refra_151287
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Jul 13, 2015

Urgent: L2 deployment

Hello, Im trying to deploy standard load balancing, but all network component in the same subnet clients,and servers, The issue that the traffic is passing through the f5 but not hitting any VS, also...
application delivery
deployment
LTM
VernonWells's avatar
VernonWells
Icon for Employee rankEmployee
Jul 14, 2015

Are 1.1 and 1.2 attached to the same VLAN, as defined on the BIG-IP? If they are not, then the BIG-IP should not switch traffic between them. Even if they are on a common VLAN, if there is a matching Virtual Server bound to the VLAN, that should handle the traffic (that is, the traffic should not be simply switched between interfaces).

In your diagram, you list a switch connected to 1.1 and a switch connected to 1.2. Naturally, if they are in fact the same switch (or are interconnected switches) and the client-side and server-side are on a common VLAN, then the traffic will never traverse the BIG-IP. I mean a topology like this:

    CLIENT      BIG-IP
      |           |
    SWITCH ---- SWITCH ---- PROXIES
                  |
                  + ---- FW

(where each "line" is a segment on the same VLAN as all other "lines").

If you want to ensure that the traffic is flowing through the BIG-IP at all, you can 

tcpdump
on the physical interface (though there is a hard 100 packet-per-second limit, so this will only work when the traffic volume is low):

You will naturally see any broadcast traffic (particularly ARP) and any flooded traffic (from switches that do not have a mac-forwarding entry), but should see unflooded unicast traffic on both 1.1 and 1.2 only if the BIG-IP is switching or forwarding.

Incidentally, what is your configuration for handling the client traffic? I would anticipate that you have a wildcard Virtual Server (0.0.0.0:80) listening on the client-side VLAN associated with a pool containing the proxies. I would further anticipate that it is a Standard Virtual Server and that it has address-translation enabled (by this I mean destination translation rather than source/SNAT translation).