Forum Discussion

Jonathan_c's avatar
Jonathan_c
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Mar 28, 2024
Solved

WAF for APM Oauth Authorization VS

Hi, We are testing the using of F5 as a OAuth Authorization Server and also a Resource Server. We have a WAF policy attached the VS representing of the Resource Server, which has an IIS server behi...
asm
ASM API
authorization server
oauth 2.0
waf
  • Daniel_Wolf's avatar
    Daniel_Wolf
    Mar 28, 2024

    Hi Jonathan_c,

    I had a lengthy discussion about this with fellow MVP Kai_Wilke and we came up with the following answer.
    The F5 Authorization Server and the Resource Server should not be at risk, otherwise F5 would provide Attack Signatures or Threat Campaign signatures for APM Resources. F5 doesn't provide any ASM signatures for APM, which for me translates to - F5 is confident you don't need such. You'd rather have to install a BIG-IP upgrade to fix any security issues with APM.

    The IIS Server might be at risk, and here it might make sense to use ASM.
    But for this use case the chain of processing (APM before ASM) would be OK.

    KR
    Daniel

Jonathan_c's avatar
Jonathan_c
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Mar 28, 2024

Hi Juergen,

Yeah, I know, forgot to mention that. If we'll add ASM we'll create a layered VS first.

But still the question is if it's even necessary? What's the best practice? 

Our integrator told us he usually doesn't add ASM to in scenarios like this, but like I find it odd.

  • Daniel_Wolf's avatar
    Daniel_Wolf
    Icon for MVP rankMVP
    Mar 28, 2024

    Hi Jonathan_c,

    I had a lengthy discussion about this with fellow MVP Kai_Wilke and we came up with the following answer.
    The F5 Authorization Server and the Resource Server should not be at risk, otherwise F5 would provide Attack Signatures or Threat Campaign signatures for APM Resources. F5 doesn't provide any ASM signatures for APM, which for me translates to - F5 is confident you don't need such. You'd rather have to install a BIG-IP upgrade to fix any security issues with APM.

    The IIS Server might be at risk, and here it might make sense to use ASM.
    But for this use case the chain of processing (APM before ASM) would be OK.

    KR
    Daniel

    • Jonathan_c's avatar
      Jonathan_c
      Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
      Mar 31, 2024

      Hi Daniel,

      Thanks for sharing your insights.

      I'm wondering if there's any official F5 document on the subject?

      • Jonathan_c's avatar
        Jonathan_c
        Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
        Apr 07, 2024

        Hi Daniel_Wolf ,

        Do you have any official F5 document on that subject?