Forum Discussion

Vince_Marco_969's avatar
Vince_Marco_969
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Dec 10, 2007

Generic Axis method execution...

Is it possible to send a generic Axis service call to iControl? Perhaps someone can help me find my problem. I am basically adapting a "get_pool_status" to 9.x. What I am getting is:

 

 

13:16:36,220 ERROR [STDERR] AxisFault

 

faultCode: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Client

 

faultSubcode:

 

faultString: Unknown method "{urn:iControl:ITCMGlobalLB/Pool}:get_enabled_state"

 

faultActor:

 

faultNode:

 

faultDetail:

 

{http://xml.apache.org/axis/}stackTrace:Unknown method "{urn:iControl:ITCMGlobalLB/Pool}:get_enabled_state"

 

at org.apache.axis.message.SOAPFaultBuilder.createFault(SOAPFaultBuilder.java:222)

 

at org.apache.axis.message.SOAPFaultBuilder.endElement(SOAPFaultBuilder.java:129)

 

at org.apache.axis.encoding.DeserializationContext.endElement(DeserializationContext.java:1087)

 

at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.endElement(Unknown Source)

 

at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanEndElement(Unknown Source)

 

 

My code is as follows:

 

 

String endpoint = "https://" + host + ":443/iControl/iControlPortal.cgi";

 

Service service = new Service();

 

Call call = (Call) service.createCall();

 

call.setTargetEndpointAddress(new java.net.URL(endpoint));

 

if (f5update)

 

{

 

call.setOperationName(new QName("urn:iControl:ITCMGlobalLB/Pool", "get_enabled_state"));

 

call.setUsername(user);

 

call.setPassword(passwd);

 

call.addParameter("pool_name", XMLType.SOAP_ARRAY, ParameterMode.IN);

 

call.setReturnType(XMLType.SOAP_ARRAY);

 

Integer[] reply = (Integer[]) call.invoke(new Object[] { pool });

 

result = (reply[1] == 1);

 

}

 

 

I tried building the iControl sdk, but ran into numerous errors due to "enum" being used as a variable, and I'm on JDK 1.5. Is there a known way around this?

 

 

Vince

 

 

dev
devops
iControl
v9

4 Replies

Sort By
  • Vince_Marco_969's avatar
    Vince_Marco_969
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Dec 10, 2007
    Ok. I found my first issue and that is the parameter name "pool_name" instead of "pool_names". Still no dice. Still battling with this. Any ideas?

     

     

  • Joe_Pruitt's avatar
    Joe_Pruitt
    Dec 10, 2007
    The error "Unknown method" is the main indicator here. First, I'm assuming you are looking at GlobalLB Pools, Not LocalLB Pools. Either way, there is a get_enabled_state() method for each. The real problem you have is with the namespace "ITCMGlobalLB". The "ITCM" prefix was for v4.x. For v9.x, it's just GlobalLB.

     

     

    call.setOperationName(new QName("urn:iControl:GlobalLB/Pool", "get_enabled_state"));

     

     

    Oh, and you need to name the parameters correctly. This method takes a Array of Strings with the name of "pool_names"

     

     

    Is there is a reason you aren't using the iControl Java Library built on top of Axis? It's available as a download from the iControl Assembly DevCentral Lab project. It basically wrapps all the compiled WSDL proxy code into a very easy to use interface.

     

     

    -Joe
  • Vince_Marco_969's avatar
    Vince_Marco_969
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Dec 10, 2007
    The only reason is lack of awareness of the iControl Assembly Lab project. F5 integration is just a small aspect of my project and the Lab area just wasn't my first stop. I am migrating from 4.x code which used generic WS calls and there isn't much to those either. But you have to get them exactly right. I do prefer the Assembly Lab API. It was very easy to integrate (15 minutes) and solved my problems exceptionally well. You're a lifesaver Joe. Thanks.

     

     

    Vince

     

     

  • Joe_Pruitt's avatar
    Joe_Pruitt
    Dec 10, 2007
    Glad to help! There are certain situations where users want full control of the iControl code and can't have another .jar included so that's why I asked. The whole reason I wrote the java library was mailing self-serving in that it greatly reduces the number of questions asked regarding namespace prefixing and parameter packing which is a major pain if doing by hand.

     

     

    Feel free to post anything else that comes up and we'll see what we can do to help out.

     

     

    -Joe