bsm1970
Mar 02, 2016Nimbostratus
Attack signatures, security policies and NAT vs Virtual Servers
I'm new to the BIG IP system so forgive me if this seems rather simple.
We have a few public facing web servers we are bringing in to our DMZ (they are hosted elsewhere now). The traffic load to them isn't such that we require a pool of replicated servers and load balancing between them for each site. Really all that's needed in terms of traffic flow is just a one-to-one NAT for each one.
However, I'm confused because it seems from what I'm reading that you can only create and apply security policies (including attack signatures, etc) to specific servers in your network if you set up a Virtual Server that the web server is tied to.
Am I reading this correctly? Or am I misunderstanding how this works?
Thanks!